Topic: Being judgmental
I have a problem. Actually, I have a litany of them. One of them though is blinding rage. Yes, blinding rage. You know you have a big problem when the problem you have sounds like they might be an 80’s rock band…this is the reason I’ve always attempted never to have a problem with my Airsupply or a Flock of Seagulls.
Now, this “rage” of mine doesn’t come out at normal times. I get cut off…I’ll probably have a snide comment. A person starts yelling at me, I’ll probably have a cocky grin. Someone does something illogical…there’s a greater than 76% chance I will turned into a green skinned monstrosity and yell “Sam smash puny idea!”….this clearly has plaid havoc with my wardrobe.
Recently I was having a conversation with an unsaved lady that I had come across in my various lunching adventures (as my youth group likes to point out…I meet the oddest people). During the course of our dialogue, she mentioned that pre-marital sex was a great thing…to which I said “You’re wrong”. This clearly led to her putting up shields that would make Darth Vader’s Super Star Destroyer the Executioner shield generators look weak. She looked at me and said that I needed to stop judging her….here is the convo:
Female: You need to stop judging me
Me: I’m not judging you, I just said you’re wrong
F: See! Such judgment!
M: Ok…if that’s judging…why is it bad to judge?
F: Because you are telling me I’m wrong
M: Do you think I’m wrong?
F: Yes
M: Ok…there ya go…you’re judging me then too
F: No I’m not…I would never say that you were wrong. I could never do that to anyone.
M: But you just…
F: I said that I think you are wrong. Not that you are wrong.
M: Same thing
F: Wow, you are close-minded.
M: No, I’m just saying, when I say “You’re wrong” clearly it means “I think you are wrong” and when I say, “I think you’re wrong” clearly I’m under the impression that you are wrong
F: No, “you’re wrong” means you think that you have the right to say if something is wrong for someone else or not, as opposed to just saying if it is wrong in your perspective. You’re just so judgmental and arrogant
Ok, now……this cause blinding rage. Her calling me judgmental? No big. Her calling me arrogant? That’s like a Where’s Waldo book where every page is nothing but a close up picture of Waldo’s face…not that impressive lady. But the mental gymnastics she was performing to hold to her failed worldview…..fury!
So, let’s just lay it out there. There is no problem with judging each other. The Bible says judge not lest you be judged, and then says not to throw pearls to swine. So obviously reading the former as precluding making any judgment calls at all is inadequate, or else Christ never would have expected us to adjudicate who the swine are. Everyday people make judgments as to what is right or wrong, good or bad….Pepsi or Coke. When I go to Best Buy, I buy 1 lap top, and not all of them. Why? I’ve judged one superior than the others. It might be price…it might be features….it might be memory…but for some reason last June I judged that my iBook was a better call than an HP with a processor on it that says “Will crash 4 times in the next year or your money back”
The fact is, this lady’s understanding of judgment comes from the Enlightenment thinker David Hume and his emotivist ethics…she’s inherited her worldview from the feminist ethic as well. But all of that to say….its patently idiotic. If I run across a guy beating a 5 y/o child with a chain, I’m not going to say, “I think what you are doing is wrong and you should stop!” and when he gets brought to trial I won’t say, “Now now jury…I think what he did was very wrong….but who am I to judge…and you with the black robe on…you better have an open mind about this one”
Wrong is wrong. Let’s debate what is wrong, but let’s not pretend that opinions are binding. Or that in debating opinions we some how escape the fact that we are debating truth. When I claim something to be wrong, I am not merely saying that I think its wrong, I’m saying that I think what I do based upon a founded belief about the ethical situation in and of itself. So you better do the same. Don’t pretend that you think the holocaust was only wrong in your opinion. That isn’t a heightened form of wisdom, its lunacy and goes against the innate ideas that make humans humans.
And again…anger!!!!
I probably should do a post on the Abolition of Man some time….

Kelly's Ideas said...
I love your mind and I respect your thought process. My goal in life as is yours, I believe, is to bring more people to Christ - by love. Yes, premarital sex is wrong... but there are many more loving ways to say "you're wrong" - can't think of one right off the top of my head... but I do know when someone tells me I'm wrong... my defenses pop out... regardless of who is right and who is wrong.. There has to be some kind of backdoor way to get through to the unsaved woman... maybe by planting seeds of love and not judgment.. I have recently been verbally attacked by someone I love because of my faith - I just let her go on and on about how awful Christians are.. but you know what? She saw by my lack of argument and judgment what a real woman of Christ is - and I know she is starting to question.... her lack of beliefs... sometimes just by listening you can be heard..
Just a thought... comment
August 3, 2009 10:10 PM
Sam said...
Kelly thank you for your comment…I’m a big fan of blog traffic;] I totally agree that we need to speak the truth in love…I only gave a synopsis of the convo in my post, but trust me…the convo had many nicer ways of it being said leading up to the straight forward “You’re wrong lass” that got me labeled ever so harshly;]
August 4, 2009 11:02 AM
Melissa said...
Amen!
August 5, 2009 10:31 AM
Dave S. said...
True that sometimes less is more, but that is a case by case basis.
On the other hand if you tailor your discussions to never trigger a defense, you have to be careful your not emotionally puppeteering the person.
Don't take this as a personal attack of your view Kelly, but scripturally the gospel does not ever take a backdoor route to someones heart. God is not a beggar that needs our approval to trade our heart of stone for a heart of love. I think that the Apostle Paul himself can attest to that after the Damascus road (Acts)
The Gospel can stand on its own 2 legs. (This is why I don't believe altar calls accomplish much)
Now having said that, the way we explain the gospel should be proper, not harsh and not angry. But I would rather walk away and say nothing then try to "sneak" God in. Thats just not how it works. Let your Yes be Yes and your No be no...
If God didn't want to "Offend" anyone the law wouldn't have ever been passed down, now its written on our hearts (Hebrews), people need to be reminded that their sins have a consequence. But again in Love as you pointed out.
August 5, 2009 10:53 PM
Ray said...
Yay for Hulky Sam smashing idiocy one Cretan at a time!
August 13, 2009 7:43 PM